Posted by: mystic444 | October 18, 2010

Choose Whom You Will Serve: God or Money

We live in a day of economic crisis. Joblessness and poverty are rampant. People don’t have enough money to pay for the essentials: their homes, food, clothing, medical care (or insurance policies to cover health care). What is causing this ‘financial meltdown’?

There are a number of conflicting answers available. There are several ‘schools’ of economics, each one convinced that it has the ‘answer’ to the crisis. One hears about the ‘Austrian’ school, favored by financial conservatives and libertarians, also known as ‘free market capitalism’. Then again there is the ‘Keynesian school’ favored by those who are considered financial liberals – or some say it’s a form of socialism. There are no doubt a number of other economic theories claiming to have the answer to our troubles.

I believe the problem, though, is far more basic; it boils down to one’s essential worldview. What do you consider ‘real’, and ‘really important’: material things, or God who is the Creator and Sustainer of all things (and our fellow human beings in whom God’s “image” is seen)?

With that question in mind, I would like to refer to a couple of statements made by one of God’s Prophets and Messengers – Jesus the son of Mary – and a statement of one of his ‘apostles’ – Paul/Saul of Tarsus.

From Jesus, in Matthew 22 (New King James Version):

[35] Then one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, testing him, and saying, [36] “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” [37] Jesus said to him, “ ‘You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. [38] This is the first and great commandment. [39] And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ [40] On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”

From Matthew 6:

[19] “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; [20] but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. [21] For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. [22] The lamp of the body is the eye. If therefore your eye is good, your whole body will be full of light. [23] But if your eye is bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in you is darkness, how great is that darkness! [24] No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. YOU CANNOT SERVE GOD AND MAMMON [money, material wealth]”.

From Paul, in 1 Timothy 6:

[9] But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and harmful lusts [desires] which drown men in destruction and perdition [ruin or loss]. [10] For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. [11] But you, O man of God, flee these things, and [instead] pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, gentleness. [12] Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold of eternal life

God’s Prophets throughout history and in all cultures (whether they’re, for instance, Jewish, Buddhist, or Christian) have consistently pointed out that there are essentially only two choices for mankind: we can worship and serve God Who is the Creator of all things; or we can worship and serve the creation. God’s Prophets, Messengers, and servants of course call us to serve God the Creator, rather than the creation. There is only one ‘religion’ which has ever been enjoined by God and His Messengers: “devotion to and submission to God”. In the Arabic language, this is called “Islam”, and those who are devoted to – and submissive to – God are called Muslims. Noah, Abraham, Moses, Gautama Buddha, David, Isaiah, Jonah, Jesus, Peter, Paul, and Muhammad were all “Muslims” because they were all devoted to God alone. There were certainly differences among them in relatively minor outward matters of ritual and terminology; but their focus was God. Whether they were “Jewish Muslims”, “Buddhist Muslims”, or “Christian Muslims”, their “religion” was truly “Islam” – “devotion to God”.

Unfortunately, mankind and its societies in general have tended to be focused on the creation and the life of this world, rather than on the Creator and “eternal life”. The things we consider valuable are material possessions; and the three most important people are “me, myself, and I” ( 😦 ).  The most important thing is that I prosper in material things; how my neighbor fares in this world is really none of my concern.

Since material possessions (“capital”) are considered valuable, these things are assigned monetary value. The value of people depends on how much “capital” they have (or the monetary equivalent of that “capital”). If I have a lot of this world’s goods, then I’m a valuable person. If I’m very poor in material “capital”, then I’m personally worthless. So the focus of my attention in work has to be on the acquisition of money rather than on serving God and my fellow human beings. My talents, skills, aptitudes, and intellectual capacity are ‘worthless’ if they don’t have great monetary value; it doesn’t matter how much enjoyment I personally may derive from them, or how such things might be used to help others or bring them enjoyment. It is the “great god Mammon” that must be served!

From the viewpoint of God’s Prophets, and those who are devoted to God, this means our ‘eyes’ are bad; and it’s just a natural consequence that our “whole body is full of darkness”. It is only the inevitable result of the “ways of God” that we are “drown[ing]… in destruction and perdition” and have “pierced [ourselves] through with many sorrows”. Because we have placed value on the wrong “things” – material possessions – we are finding fulfilled in ourselves what Paul wrote in Galatians 6:7 and 8: Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption…

Therefore, I would invite people to turn back to the one “religion” which God has always enjoined upon mankind: devotion and service to God rather than the things He created. I challenge you to have a revolutionary change in attitude, whereby what we consider valuable is the “image of God” in human beings, rather than the worldly goods humans possess. The things we possess – including especially our personal inclinations, talents, skills, and intellectual capacity – should be considered our ‘tools’ which we use to honor God by serving our ‘neighbors’.

This brings me back to a point I made in a former blog article: “What Do We Consider Valuable?” It is high time we begin to consider the possibility of getting rid of the concept of “money” altogether. Instead of putting monetary value on my labor, the value of my labor should be in the service it provides to people who can benefit from my contribution. We should provide our contributions ‘freely’ to society. Others will benefit from what I provide, and I will benefit from what others provide. Doctors would provide their services willingly and freely to all; those with mechanical skills would do the same; farmers would do likewise, etc. Think about it a bit. Imagine what the world would be like if no one charged for the contributions he makes to society, and no one had to pay for the benefits he receives. Poverty would disappear, because everything would be freely available to all. Because all employment related to financial matters would no longer exist (banks, the Internal Revenue Service, Tax Accountants, Loan Agencies, Financial Planners and Advisers, etc.) there would be a lot more people available in the ‘workforce’ for those jobs which would still exist. Instead of needing to work at least a 40 hour week, each person could work a whole lot less without suffering from financial loss – and have a whole lot more time for family and other pursuits – because there would be so many more people available to work those jobs. People who have to work at jobs they hate because the things they like to do aren’t monetarily valuable (they don’t provide enough income to get by), would no longer have to do so. They could do the things they enjoy, and contribute to the enjoyment and benefit of others, without the financial worries. I spent 30 years as an over-the-road truck driver; but in that 30 years I worked for a number of different trucking companies, trying to find one that would relieve the financial pressure. I wound up leaving companies that I really liked because they “just didn’t pay enough”. If my only concerns had been to do something I enjoy while also contributing to the well being of society and thereby honoring God, I wouldn’t have been jumping from one company to another. (I do acknowledge that the last company I worked for – the final 10 years before I was declared disabled – did provide a comfortable income in addition to being a company for which I enjoyed working).

Until we can arrive at the universal change in outlook necessary to be able to implement a moneyless society, those of us who seek to love God, and love our neighbors as we love ourselves, should seek to focus on laboring in service to God and our neighbor rather than for the purpose of acquiring money and material capital; and trust in the One who is our Sustainer to make sure we have the material things we need. While we will realize that in the present world situation money really is necessary to purchase the material things we need, we should still not let it be the focus of our attention; let the Sovereign and Sustainer of the world “worry” about it (and we may be sure He is not “worried” 😀 )!



  1. Lovely sharp post. Never thought that it was this easy. Extolment to you!

  2. You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with
    your blog.

  3. There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also.
    Keep working ,great job!

  4. I discovered your blog site on google and check a few of your early posts. Continue to keep up the very good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading more from you later on!?

  5. This all really gets me thinking…

    I remember reading the beginning of Acts and thinking – Man! These guys are communists! Then I told it to my pastors wife, a theologian, and she disagreed and came back at me with some other proof texts that not all Christians gave all they had. I guess in America the comeback would be even more sharp you guys really don’t like the “c” word.

    Anyway, her example was actually the couple in Acts who got struck down at the feet of Peter and that they would have been accepted had they only given half their money and not lied about it. It wasn’t a great example (Zacchaeus Lk 19 would be a bit better) but it made me realise: We can pick and choose the verses we like to suit the theology we like. The Bible is ambiguous. This is VERY worrying.

    Richard Hays describes this problem quite well in his The Moral Vision of the New Testament at the beginning of part one. He says we should be wary of people who neutralise the force of one passage by using another one from a different work. He says it’s OK within a specific book (e.g. 1 John 3:6 vs 1 John 1:8) but not across books lest we empty the message of it’s power.

    Unfortunately I don’t think Hays offers a way to harmonise conflicting accounts (e.g. Gal 3:28 vs 1 Cor 14:34ff).

    In my opinion we MUST pick and choose and the cross is the means of choosing. If we choose comfy verses which make our lives better we must be wary. If we choose difficult verses which make others life better we’re on the right track. The cross is, after all, mainly a symbol of suffering so that others can life.

    Thus we must choose the “give up all your possessions if you want to follow me” from Luke 14 over any other passages which say you can have a nice home and lots of money.

  6. I love it, very insightful and worth debate. Can I borrow it for my blog?

    • Thanks for the comment, Jack. I put off writing the article for a several weeks because I figured people would think it’s “just TOO weird” – or even “communist heresy”! 😆 And I had already written one previous article advocating the idea.

      You are certainly welcome to use anything in my blog articles which you like.

      • Thanks! I’m a Muslim but a lot of this rings true for me and I can back it up from my texts as well (not that I need to, the Bible is a perfectly legit source for things like this), I can really see it working if, as you say, there is a change of attitude. We really need to move away from this idea of bits of paper, I remember the introduction to Douglas Adams book, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. To me, it sums up our little planet:

        “Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun.

        Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

        This planet has — or rather had — a problem, which was this: most of the people on it were unhappy for pretty much of the time. Many solutions were suggested for this problem, but most of these were largely concerned with the movements of small green pieces of paper, which is odd because on the whole it wasn’t the small green pieces of paper that were unhappy.

        And so the problem remained; lots of the people were mean, and most of them were miserable, even the ones with digital watches.

        Many were increasingly of the opinion that they’d all made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place. And some said that even the trees had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have left the oceans.

        And then, one Thursday, nearly two thousand years after one man had been nailed to a tree for saying how great it would be to be nice to people for a change, one girl sitting on her own in a small cafe in Rickmansworth suddenly realized what it was that had been going wrong all this time, and she finally knew how the world could be made a good and happy place. This time it was right, it would work, and no one would have to get nailed to anything.”

        Oh, and ignore the people who will call you a commie, they are just eating the ‘corporate’ propaganda that tells them they need to buy to be happy. Sad world we live in…

      • There is another thing that I remember reading this. Some time ago, the BBC did a bit of research to find who contributed the ‘most’ to society and slapped a pound sterling value on it. Know who came out top? Hospital cleaners, with a ‘value’ of several hundred thousand each. And the bottom? Accountants, with a ‘loss; to society of up to millions each through all the tax reductions they work for the cooperate world. Kinda says it all really… Your article greatly reminds me of this research and the part you said about contributions to society I’ll see if I can find it.


        • I appreciate your “contribution” on this subject, Jack. In our “money based” society where knowledge, innate abilities, and acquired skills are “weighed” for value, “worth” is a highly subjective matter – and that can wind up producing some very skewed results.

          But if we didn’t seek to “weigh” people and their contributions in order to assign relative worth – instead recognizing each person as equally valuable due to the “image of God” within him/her – I believe the world would be a much better place.

          In a money based society, accountants also have an important role to play. Many of us simply don’t have the ability to keep up with all the financial and tax regulations – and perhaps we can’t even “make heads or tails” of financial and economic matters – so people who do have that ability are very important to us. But of course in the moneyless society I envision, accountants would have no place at all. The abilities and skills they have which enable them to perform that function in society could be focused in other areas of life. They could no doubt still find ways to perform ‘valuable’ service to people, but their real ‘value’ would be – as with everyone else – their humanity. Each is created by God as a piece in the “jigsaw puzzle” of life, and no other piece can fill his place.

  7. I share your vision but we have to admit it’s utopian.

    • Definitely Utopian! 🙂 It’s a vision toward which we should aim – and just maybe be a bit “evangelistic” about it. In the meantime, those of us who have this vision should do what we can to implement the vision in our personal lives. As I said in the final paragraph, we won’t be able to actually eliminate the use of money until a universal change in attitude is achieved; but we can ‘work at’ making our focus less and less on the material, and more and more on the spiritual and eternal values.

      As someone said on a forum in which I participate – well actually it’s been several weeks since I actually participated – we need both the visionaries and the “down to earth” people. Each has something important to contribute.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: