Posted by: mystic444 | October 24, 2010

Pink Whistles, or Black Whistles?

A group of referees for High School football games in the state of Washington decided to donate their income for last Thursday night’s games (10/21/10) to a charitable organization for breast cancer research. In addition, they decided to use pink whistles for that night’s games. (See this article.) The only problem was, state regulations concerning protocol for game officials require that black whistles be used. Therefore, these referees who carried out the heinous offense of using the pink whistles may be suspended for a couple of games.

The Washington Officials Association (WOA) maintains that rules are rules; by violating even such a minor regulation, the officials are supposedly setting a bad example for High School students. Those students might conclude from this that it’s perfectly legitimate to break the rules whenever it suits their fancy. I guess the WOA thinks those students are totally brainless! 🙄

It seems to me that the WOA would be setting the bad example, by saying that their rules are so important (even to the smallest detail) that they can’t be ‘violated’ even for the purpose of doing good and showing kindness and mercy.

Let’s see what a man who is almost universally acclaimed as a good man and Prophet of God has to say about such matters. I refer to Jesus Christ of course. He is specifically acknowledged as a messenger of God by both Christians and Muslims; and many people from other religions also highly value this man of God. I know that at least some Buddhists have come to recognize Jesus as a ‘brother’ of the Buddha; and the Hindu Paramahansa Yogananda and his guru Sri Yukteswar valued Jesus as highly as any of their Hindu saints. Even some Jews – and not just those who have ‘converted’ to Christianity or Islam – have come to recognize Jesus as one of the greatest of Hebrew Prophets. They see him as a great reformer, who sought to cleanse Judaism from some major corruptions that had crept in and defiled their religion.

So let’s see what Jesus had to say when confronting some Pharisees who were being overly zealous for details of Jewish Law:

[1] At that time Jesus went through the grainfields on the sabbath; his disciples were hungry, and they began to pluck heads of grain and to eat. [2] When the Pharisees saw it, they said to him, “Look, your disciples are doing what is not lawful to do on the sabbath.” [3] He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he and his companions were hungry? [4] He entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence, which it was not lawful for him or his companions to eat, but only for the priests. [5] Or have you not read that on the sabbath the priests in the temple break the sabbath and yet are guiltless? [6] I tell you, something greater than the temple is here. [7] But if you had known what this means, ‘I desire mercy and not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the guiltless. [8] For the son of man is Lord of the sabbath.

[9] He left that place and entered their synagogue; [10] a man was there with a withered hand, and they asked him, “Is it lawful to cure on the sabbath?” so that they might accuse him. [11] He said to them, “Suppose one of you has only one sheep and it falls into a pit on the sabbath; will you not lay hold of it and lift it out? [12] How much more valuable is a human being than a sheep! So it is lawful to do good on the sabbath.” [13] Then he said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and it was restored, as sound as the other. [14] But the Pharisees went out and conspired against him, how to destroy him (Matthew 12:1-14, New Revised Standard Version).

I think it would be very difficult, to say the least, to improve on this teaching of Jesus. 🙂 It is much better – more ‘righteous’ – to show kindness and mercy than to be a stickler for regulations. As Jesus said, referring to the Hebrew Prophet Hosea (6:6), God prefers people to show mercy more than detailed keeping of legal rules (“I desire mercy and not sacrifice”).

I hope the Washington Officials Association will learn that mercy is more valuable than ‘zeal for the law’, and will back down from their threat to penalize those referees. If they don’t, though, I hope the other officials (who weren’t refereeing Thursday night) will support their fellows by refusing to do any officiating until the WOA backs down. Then the WOA will have to decide whether their minute regulations are so important that it’s better to cancel games for lack of referees. The students, parents, and other fans already overwhelmingly support those thoughtful referees; what do you suppose their reaction will be to the WOA if they refuse to back down and the football season grinds to a halt as a result of such idiocy?

At any rate, this situation can serve as an example of a principle that each of us can practice in our own lives: kindness and love trump detailed adherence to rules and regulations. 🙂



  1. Excellent article, you really don’t have enough readers or thanks! There are several things I want to write about regarding this, all of it good don’t worry, but it’s late (or rather early) so I will, God Willing, write you out something in the near future.



    • Thanks, Jack, for your kind words. I’ll certainly look forward to anything you wish to say.

      God’s kindness and peace to you — Stephen

      • And unto you

        Really, you don’t get enough thanks, even though you ‘only’ put a few posts out they are all worth a read, puts my attempts to shame!

        I’m sure that you are aware that this idea and concept is present in all faiths (I don’t use the word religion, religion is what happens when man meddles with faith) but being a Muslim, a few examples from Mohamed stick in my mind. Of course, the Qu’ran mentions that the revelation (i.e. faith) was only sent to aid mankind, not to make things difficult for it.

        The first is a group of his followers who decided to roam the land living like ‘monks’ (for want of a better word) and giving up everything. Mohamed told of these people for taking things too far, for interfering with ‘normal’ life and thus going against faith by behaving like that.

        The second is a more specific example. One of Mohamed’s followers visited the house of another to find the man’s wife dressed in a very plain way despite the fact that her husband had just returned from a long time away, i.e. she wasn’t dressed up for him as was normal (and is now). He asked why and it turned out that the husband had been abstaining from his wife as part of his ‘fast’ as well as staying up all night praying. Mohamed reminded this man that again, he was taking it too far and that as well as his life, he had his wife to consider as well, by being what he saw as ‘pious’ and spending all day fasting and praying, he was in fact going against faith by harming his wife and others around him through his actions.

        The third was during a pilgrimage. Mohamed was alerted to a man that was very weak and when he made enquirers it turned out that the man, despite traveling on a long and harsh journey, had decided to fast as well, again because he saw it was pious. Once again, Mohamed told this man off because he was harming himself through his actions (and then by this the others around him who were having to care for him), again something that faith and God would obviously prohibit.

        I know these aren’t really 100% relative to what you’re writing about, but I feel they are saying the same thing, don’t be over zealous!



        • Thanks again for your input, Jack. I have come to have a profound respect for Islam this year; presently almost all of the “Scripture” reading I do is from the Qur’an. However I am nowhere near having enough familiarity with it to be able to call to mind examples from the Qur’an – much less from Sunnah and Hadith – as you can. But very obviously the Prophet Muhammad was a quite a wise man – by the gift of God – and knew well how to ‘balance’ devotion to God with very practical concerns. He knew that “the sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath”, to apply a statement of Jesus.

          Your references from the life of Muhammad were very relevant; they took the same principle and applied it in a different way. Whereas I was making the point of not being overly zealous in pressing details of “the law” on others, you make the equally valid point that we can be overly zealous for “the law” with reference to our own selves. Same principle, different applications. Thanks – and peace to you also. — Stephen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: